These sample pictures are from the Karabakh war
for more pictures visit:
http://www.armenianreality.com/massacres_in_azerbaijan/pictures_of_azerbaijan_massacre.html
Thursday, February 1, 2007
TURKISH GONECIDE
These sample pictures are from the Karabakh war
for more pictures visit:
http://www.armenianreality.com/massacres_in_azerbaijan/pictures_of_azerbaijan_massacre.html
CAMPAIGNE AGAINST THE PRO-ARMENIAN BILL IN THE FRENCH PARLIAMENT
A bill limiting the freedom of expression has been prepared by the French Socialist Party (PS) and will be voted in the French Parliament on October 12, 2006. The "denial bill" would make it a crime to publicly deny the Armenian genocide. It was postponed previously in May. As ARMENIAN REALITY, we invite French democrats, Turks, and all friends of Turkey to send an e-mail message to the French parliamentarians. To do this, a single click on the following link is enough. Please copy the French text below (or write your own), click on the link below, and paste it on the open window. The generic address will automatically deliver the message to all the French parliamentarians.
an-fr@tetedeturc.org
(If you don't use Outlook, please send the letter to the same address from your own e-mail address)
APPEL AUX DEPUTES FRANÇAIS
Malgré une forte pression des organisations arméniennes de lobbying, vous, les députés français, n’aviez finalement pas voté la loi de censure proposée par le Parti Socialiste visant à pénaliser par une peine de prison et de lourdes amendes toute contestation publique de la thèse arménienne de "génocide". Après le report de l’examen de cette proposition de loi, l’association "Liberté Pour L’histoire", qui rassemble plus de 600 historiens et chercheurs français, déclare à nouveau "considérer cette initiative comme injustifiée et pernicieuse" Le président de l’Assemblée nationale Jean-Louis Debré, lors de la séance d’initiative parlementaire du 18 mai dernier, avait rappelé sa position très claire : la loi n’écrit pas l’histoire, la loi est là pour fixer des normes, elle n’est là pas pour dire quel est le sens d’événements historiques". Nous n’avons ni à écrire l’histoire de la France, ni à écrire l’histoire des relations entre les autres peuples. Ce n’est pas à la France de dire quelle interprétation on doit donner à ces rapports entre ces deux pays [la Turquie et l’Arménie]", avait-t-il affirmé. Si cette proposition de loi était alors adoptée, une telle loi risquerait d’interdire tout débat ultérieur aux historiens désireux d’éclaircir les responsabilités des parties dans ces événements tragiques. La Turquie a toujours soutenu qu’il appartient aux historiens, et non aux institutions politiques nationales, de metre à jour la vérité. Nombre de responsables politiques français, de tout bord, ont eu ces derniers mois l’occasion d’exprimer une position voisine. Dans cet esprit, et afin de trouver une issue équitable à un conflit de mémoire presque séculaire, le Premier Ministre de la République de Turquie, M. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, en plein accord avec le chef du principal parti d’opposition, M. Deniz Baykal, a pris l’initiative d’adresser une nouvelle proposition au Président de la République d’Arménie, M. Robert Kotcharian: il plaide pour la création conjointe d’une commission composée d’historiens turcs et arméniens, en s’engageant d’avance à accepter les conclusions de ses travaux. La Turquie est prête à confronter chaque séquence de son passé. Le Parlement turc a donné son approbation totale et son soutien unanime à cette proposition. La Grande Assemblée Nationale de Turquie adopte et soutient entièrement cette proposition à caractère historique. » La Turquie reste consciente que la voie vers la réconciliation et la paix ne peut s’ouvrir qu’à travers le dialogue. Elle a la conviction que les efforts en ce sens contribueront à la normalisation des relations entre les peuples turc et arménien. Sous la lumière de ce que je viens de citer en haut, nous appelons les députés français à se joindre à nous pour soutenir la mise en œuvre du débat et du dialogue à propos d'établir une commission conjointe et à rejeter un tel projet de loi, qui sera finalement inscrit à l’ordre du jour du Parti Socialiste le 12 octobre prochain, visant à sanctionner par une peine de prison et de lourdes amendes toute contestation publique de la thèse arménienne de "génocide". Nul doute qu’elle créera les conditions d’un accord impartial qui permettra d’atteindre finalement la vérité et de soulager les consciences. Je vous prie d’agréer, messieurs les députés, l’assurance de ma considération. Merci d'avance d'avoir participé à cette campagne
Participez à notre campagne, s’il vous plaît!
an-fr@tetedeturc.org
(If you don't use Outlook, please send the letter to the same address from your own e-mail address)
APPEL AUX DEPUTES FRANÇAIS
Malgré une forte pression des organisations arméniennes de lobbying, vous, les députés français, n’aviez finalement pas voté la loi de censure proposée par le Parti Socialiste visant à pénaliser par une peine de prison et de lourdes amendes toute contestation publique de la thèse arménienne de "génocide". Après le report de l’examen de cette proposition de loi, l’association "Liberté Pour L’histoire", qui rassemble plus de 600 historiens et chercheurs français, déclare à nouveau "considérer cette initiative comme injustifiée et pernicieuse" Le président de l’Assemblée nationale Jean-Louis Debré, lors de la séance d’initiative parlementaire du 18 mai dernier, avait rappelé sa position très claire : la loi n’écrit pas l’histoire, la loi est là pour fixer des normes, elle n’est là pas pour dire quel est le sens d’événements historiques". Nous n’avons ni à écrire l’histoire de la France, ni à écrire l’histoire des relations entre les autres peuples. Ce n’est pas à la France de dire quelle interprétation on doit donner à ces rapports entre ces deux pays [la Turquie et l’Arménie]", avait-t-il affirmé. Si cette proposition de loi était alors adoptée, une telle loi risquerait d’interdire tout débat ultérieur aux historiens désireux d’éclaircir les responsabilités des parties dans ces événements tragiques. La Turquie a toujours soutenu qu’il appartient aux historiens, et non aux institutions politiques nationales, de metre à jour la vérité. Nombre de responsables politiques français, de tout bord, ont eu ces derniers mois l’occasion d’exprimer une position voisine. Dans cet esprit, et afin de trouver une issue équitable à un conflit de mémoire presque séculaire, le Premier Ministre de la République de Turquie, M. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, en plein accord avec le chef du principal parti d’opposition, M. Deniz Baykal, a pris l’initiative d’adresser une nouvelle proposition au Président de la République d’Arménie, M. Robert Kotcharian: il plaide pour la création conjointe d’une commission composée d’historiens turcs et arméniens, en s’engageant d’avance à accepter les conclusions de ses travaux. La Turquie est prête à confronter chaque séquence de son passé. Le Parlement turc a donné son approbation totale et son soutien unanime à cette proposition. La Grande Assemblée Nationale de Turquie adopte et soutient entièrement cette proposition à caractère historique. » La Turquie reste consciente que la voie vers la réconciliation et la paix ne peut s’ouvrir qu’à travers le dialogue. Elle a la conviction que les efforts en ce sens contribueront à la normalisation des relations entre les peuples turc et arménien. Sous la lumière de ce que je viens de citer en haut, nous appelons les députés français à se joindre à nous pour soutenir la mise en œuvre du débat et du dialogue à propos d'établir une commission conjointe et à rejeter un tel projet de loi, qui sera finalement inscrit à l’ordre du jour du Parti Socialiste le 12 octobre prochain, visant à sanctionner par une peine de prison et de lourdes amendes toute contestation publique de la thèse arménienne de "génocide". Nul doute qu’elle créera les conditions d’un accord impartial qui permettra d’atteindre finalement la vérité et de soulager les consciences. Je vous prie d’agréer, messieurs les députés, l’assurance de ma considération. Merci d'avance d'avoir participé à cette campagne
Participez à notre campagne, s’il vous plaît!
CAMPAIGNE AGAINST THE PRO-ARMENIAN BILL IN THE FRENCH PARLIAMENT
Please copy the text below, click on the following given link, and paste it on the mail box, which will apeear when you click on the e-mail address on the right hand side.
http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/Government/mayor_oscar_b_goodman.htm
Mayor Oscar B. Goodman City Hall, Tenth Floor, 400 Stewart Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89101
Erecting a hate monument in Las Vegas is highly improper
Dear Mayor Goodman,
As concerned American citizens of Turkish heritage and members of Turkish Society living in Nevada, we were deeply saddened and hurt by the news that you have "... announced the city's commitment to dedicate land..." for an Armenian Genocide Memorial in Centennial Plaza in downtown Las Vegas. An Armenian newspaper boasts that you have made this announcement "...during the annual April 24 commemoration, which was also attended by all three Nevada congressmen, Rep. Jon Porter, Rep. Shelley Berkley, and Rep. Jim Gibbons, as well as a representative from Sen. John Ensign's office..."
We oppose the use of the term genocide in connection with the Turkish-Armenian conflict during World War I. Genocide is a highly charged, technical, legal term, precisely defined by the United Nations in 1948, and can only be used after a "competent tribunal" reaches that verdict after proper "due process". There are no court verdicts, such as Nuremberg, clearing the way for this term to be used in connection with the Turkish-Armenian conflict during WWI [1] The British had attempted to try the Turkish leadership of the alleged war crimes; failed to come up with any supporting evidence that could stand the scrutiny of a court of law right ; and eventually had to let the Turkish detainees go without filing a single charge. [2] That is why the British government, to this day, will refuse to regard this human tragedy that engulfed Armenians, Turks, and other inhabitants of the area a genocide despite pressure and threats from the Armenian Diaspora. [3] Similarly, neither the United States [4] nor Israel [5] will bow the intimidating pressure by the Armenian Diaspora to call the tragedy a genocide.
Dear Mayor,
You hold a law degree and have been a successful trial lawyer in the past. You, above all else, should know the difference between allegations and facts. Armenian charges of genocide are yet-to-be-proven "allegations", not incontrovertible facts. In the absence of a verdict by a competent court, therefore, all the civilized and decent people of the world must use the qualifier "alleged" before the phrase "Armenian Genocide", let alone erecting a monument it on public land.
No one is trying to minimize the suffering of the Armenians; but Armenian suffering must not blind one to the much larger suffering of the Turks and other Muslims of the same era and area, mostly caused by the brutal acts of greedy and vicious Armenian revolutionaries supported by invaders bent on destroying the Ottoman Empire ( Britain, France, and Russia and their Ottoman-Christian proxies.) Calling it genocide would unfairly place all the blame on Turks whereas it was the Ottoman-Armenian revolutionaries that first poisoned the 800 years of mostly harmonious Turkish-Armenian co-habitation in Anatolia with their revolts and treason. [6] We would not oppose Armenians' recognition of Armenian losses if their memorial was named a more realistic "The Armenians' War Memorial."
Dear Mayor, we know that you will do the right thing. Peace in our time,
[1] Revisiting the Armenian Genocide - Middle East Quarterly , Guenter Lewy
[2] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=441&yid=4 , "The Malta Tribunal : Case Closed Due To Lack Of Evidence", Bilal N. Simsir
[3] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=453&yid=4 , British Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[4] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=451&yid=4 , American Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[5] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=462&yid=4 , Israeli and Jewish Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[6] http://www.ataa.org/ataa/ref/armenian/testimony.html "The Armenian Issue Revisited: Testimony" by Justin McCarthy at the House International Committee also
[7] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=490&yid=4 , Armenian Terrorism: Then And Now
[8] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=509&yid=4 , "Turkish Last Names : Honest Story Tellers", Ergun Kirlikovali
[9] ] Why it was a tragedy of war, Bruce Fein
[10] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=525&yid=4 , Connecting The Dots On The "Alleged" Armenian Genocide [11] http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/andonian.htm , The Andonian "Documents" Attributed to Talat Pasha Are Forgeries, By Professor Türkkaya ATAÖV
Lettre Témoin (Française):
Monsieur Le Député,
Depuis longtemps les relations de la République Turque, candidat à l’Union européenne, sont en train de gagner une nouvelle dimension entre les pays Occidentaux. On va justifier que l’Europe, avec le déclenchement de la candidature de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, n’est pas un club chrétien et est une communauté basée sur des valeurs humanitaires et démocratiques. Personne ne doute que la candidature de la Turquie à l’Union européenne donne naissance aux conséquences extrêmement positives à la fois pour la nation turque et européenne. Avec l’admission de la Turquie au membre de l’Union, l’Europe non seulement gagnera un marché de 70 millions, mais aussi obtiendra une porte qui s’ouvre au Moyen Orient, Moyen Asie et aux pays islamiques. Avec le membre de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, ceux qui prévoient le conflit des civilisations se tromperont alors que ceux qui défendent la paix universelle seront renforcés. Terminée son évolution économique, laïque et démocratique la République Turque, sera un modèle à la fois pour les pays du Moyen Orient et à ceux des Caucasiens. Conscient de ce qui passe l’opinion publique turque considère l’Union européenne comme un projet de civilisation le plus grand et approuve la participation à l’Union européenne avec une majorité de 90%. Il faut que vous répondiez franchement et sans préjuger à l’attente du peuple turc défendant la sécurité de l’Europe pendant la guerre froide et que vous encouragiez l’opinion publique turque pour une coopération de plus près avec l’Union européenne.
Malheureusement avec l’influence de certains milieux fanatiques, le Parlement européen a pris certaines décisions injustes, ce qui a déçu l’opinion publique turque. Parmi ces décisions se trouvent celles destinées à la reconnaissance du soi-disant génocide des arméniens. Ces décisions prises sous l’influence des associations arméniennes et des lobbies racistes, sans écouter les points de vue de la Turquie, ne correspondent pas aux valeurs démocratiques et humanitaires que défend le Parlement européen et cela laisse des soupçons profonds dans l’esprit du peuple turc.
Sous des conditions lourdes de la première guerre mondiale en 1915 pour arrêter les massacres que causent les rebelles arméniennes, l’exode que l’Empire ottoman avait fait est présenté comme un massacre par les organisations arméniennes. Nombreux scientifiques occidentaux, non pas les historiens turcs, se sont exprimés que le soi-disant génocide des arméniens n’était qu’un mensonge controuvé et que les réalités historiques étaient détournées. Dans leur recherche Gilles Veinstein, un historien français; Bernard Lewis, un spécialiste en Moyen Orient, Justin McCarthy, Samuel Weems et une centaine de scientifiques ont justifié que ce qui avait vécu en 1915, n’était pas un génocide. Mais malheureusement est survenue la terreur arménienne dans le domaine scientifique et ces scientifiques ont subi des menaces et pressions intenses des arméniens. Les Arméniens ont appliqué des méthodes incroyables pour que ces recherches ne soient pas connues par l’opinion.
En exploitant des valeurs comme les droits de l’homme et la démocratie, les organisations arméniennes racistes, d’une part se sont efforcées d’obtenir des intérêts spirituels et financiers, d’autre part n’ont pas hésité à avoir recours à la terreur. Vous ne pouvez pas avoir oublié que l’organisation terroriste arménienne dite ”ASALA” avait assassiné les diplomates turcs et même les civils innocents jusqu’à 1984. En plus je voudrais vous rappeler que ces crimes ont été vécus en Europe. Ces réseaux sanglants, sous le masque des organisations de communautés civiles et d’associations, tentent de faire des actes pour saboter les relations turco-européennes. Le seul but des ces milieux fascistes qui n’ont pas tiré de leçons de l’histoire est d’établir la grande Arménie avec les territoires arrachés de la Turquie, Azerbaïdjan et Géorgie. Les occupations que l’on vit à Karabakh en ce moment, les massacres appliqués aux azéris et l’épuration ethnique en est la preuve la plus concrète du plan sinistre. Depuis 10 années les territoires d’Azerbaïdjan sont occupés par les Arméniens et à cause de l’épuration ethnique, des centaines de milles azéris sont en train de vivre loin de leur territoire. Je vous conseille de ne pas oublier que ceux qui défendent les victimes du génocide de 1915 ont massacré des milliers de civils à Karabakh à la fin du 20’ème siècle.
Monsieur le député, sous la lumière de ce que je viens de citer en haut je vous appèle à vous opposer à la propagande injuste des organisations arméniennes pro-terroristes. Rendre la paix durable en Europe, mettre fin aux conflits en Caucase, sauver les territoires d’Azerbaïdjan de l’occupation arménienne et renvoyer chez eux les azéris soumis à une épuration ethnique est votre devoir de l’humanité. Vos décisions pour le soi-disant génocide encourageraient l’impérialisme et la terreur arménienne. De plus ces décisions blessent profondément le peuple turc qui a perdu 3 millions et demi de gens pendant la première guerre mondiale. C’est le drame que la plupart des gens qui ont perdu leur vie subissent des attaques des bandes arméniennes. Vos décisions récompensent les agresseurs et attristent les innocents. C’est pourquoi je vous demande de prendre des mesures pour compenser l’atmosphère négative de la décision du 18 juillet 1987.
Je vous prie d’agréer, Monsieur le député, l’assurance de ma considération.
http://www.armenianreality.com
Lettre Témoin (Anglaise):
Dear Parliamentarian,
The relations of Turkish Republic to Western world, which has been a candidate for EU membership for a long time, are about to gain a new dimension. With the start of the membership negotiations with Turkey in 2004 by EU, it would be proven that the European Union is a union based on democratic and human values rather than being only a Christian club. Nobody calls it into question that Turkey’s EU membership will bring very positive results for both Europe and Turkish people. By accepting Turkey to the membership, EU will not only acquire a seventy million market but also it will have a robust door opening to the Middle East, Central Asia and Islamic countries. With Turkey’s EU membership the ones who defend universal peace will gain strength while those who provide for the clash of the civilizations lose ground. A democratic and secular Turkey Republic that has completed her economic development will continue to more effectively play her role of being a good sample for regional countries, especially the Middle East and Caucasia. The Turkish public opinion fully aware of these facts accepts the EU as the greatest civilization project and approves Turkey’s EU membership with a majority reaching 90%. You would certainly appreciate the fact that Europe must sincerely respond to this expectation of the Turkish people, having defended the security of Europe during the Cold War era by paying big prices, without prejudice and Turkish public opinion must be encouraged to make closer cooperation with EU.
Influenced by certain fanatic circles, European Parliament has, unfortunately, taken some decisions, which are wrong, even disappointing the Turkish people. Of these decisions the ones regarding recognition of the alleged Armenian genocide draw special attention. The decisions approved in the Parliament, where the Turkish representatives have not existed, without hearing Turkey’s position in this respect which have been taken with influence of extreme-racist Armenian associations and lobbies contradict the human and democratic values the European Parliament defend and cause deep doubts in the minds of Turkish people.
Today, some Armenian organizations try the deportation the Ottoman administration practiced under the severe conditions of the World War I in 1915 in order to prevent the massacres caused by Armenian risings, to present as genocide. Not only Turkish historians but also many Western scientists have clearly stated the fact that the alleged Armenian genocide is fictitious and the historical truths have been deviated. The researches of French Gilles Veinstein, Middle East specialist Bernard Lewis, Justin McCarthy, Samuel Weems and many more scientists have proven that the events occurred in 1915 is not a genocide. The Armenian terror has, unfortunately, displayed itself also in the scientific field, and these researchers have been exposed to massive threats and pressures. Incredible methods have been employed to prevent the public opinion from being informed about the researches of these scientists.
Racist Armenian organizations have exploited such values as democracy and human rights, to which the European public opinion shows a great sensitivity, in an unfair manner and tried to acquire physical and moral advantage while they have not hesitated from employing terror. I am sure you remember that the Armenian terror organization called ASALA has massacred tens of Turkish diplomats in particular and many innocent civilians until 1984. Moreover, I would like to remind you that a big part of these murders have been experienced in Europe. These bloody murder networks have made great efforts to sabotage the increasingly good relations between the EU and Turkey under the cover of democratic civil society organizations or associations for a long time. The real intention of these fanatic Armenian organizations drawing hatred and enmity from the history instead of learning a lesson is not defending a humanitarian matter. The purpose of these fascist groups is to establish Great Armenia by obtaining some territories from Turkey in particular, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The occupation of Karabagh, massacres on Azerbaijani people and ethnical cleansing are the most concrete evidence for this insidious plan. The Armenian rebels have occupied 20% of Azerbaijani territory for ten years and one million two hundred thousand Azerbaijani people have been displaced and are currently living far from their homeland due to the ethnical cleansing. I propose you to keep in mind that those who introduce themselves to you as the victims of an alleged 1915 genocide have brutally massacred thousands of Azerbaijani civilians in the city Khodjali in Karabagh at the end of 20th Century.
Dear Parliamentarian, I would like to invite you to oppose the untruthful propaganda of the Armenian organizations not hesitating to employ violence under the light of the facts I have tried to explain you. It is a obligation of humanity for you to stand against the Armenian expansionism in order to ensure a permanent peace in our Europe, make an end to the conflicts in Caucasus, save the Azerbaijani territory from the occupation and ensure the one million two hundred thousand Azerbaijani people, who have been exposed to ethnical cleansing, returning to their homes. Your decisions taken 18.07.1987, which were in favor of the alleged genocide, encourage Armenian terror and expansionism. Moreover, these decisions deeply hurt the Turkish people having suffered a three and a half million loss during the World War I. And it is a big tragedy that most of the Turkish victims who have lost their lives have been exposed to attacks of Armenian rebels who have seen war as a great opportunity. Your decisions reward the aggressors while they lead the innocent people to great sorrow. I hope, therefore, you will take decisions that will eliminate the adverse effects of your decision taken 18.07.1987.
Yours faithfully.
http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/Government/mayor_oscar_b_goodman.htm
Mayor Oscar B. Goodman City Hall, Tenth Floor, 400 Stewart Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89101
Erecting a hate monument in Las Vegas is highly improper
Dear Mayor Goodman,
As concerned American citizens of Turkish heritage and members of Turkish Society living in Nevada, we were deeply saddened and hurt by the news that you have "... announced the city's commitment to dedicate land..." for an Armenian Genocide Memorial in Centennial Plaza in downtown Las Vegas. An Armenian newspaper boasts that you have made this announcement "...during the annual April 24 commemoration, which was also attended by all three Nevada congressmen, Rep. Jon Porter, Rep. Shelley Berkley, and Rep. Jim Gibbons, as well as a representative from Sen. John Ensign's office..."
We oppose the use of the term genocide in connection with the Turkish-Armenian conflict during World War I. Genocide is a highly charged, technical, legal term, precisely defined by the United Nations in 1948, and can only be used after a "competent tribunal" reaches that verdict after proper "due process". There are no court verdicts, such as Nuremberg, clearing the way for this term to be used in connection with the Turkish-Armenian conflict during WWI [1] The British had attempted to try the Turkish leadership of the alleged war crimes; failed to come up with any supporting evidence that could stand the scrutiny of a court of law right ; and eventually had to let the Turkish detainees go without filing a single charge. [2] That is why the British government, to this day, will refuse to regard this human tragedy that engulfed Armenians, Turks, and other inhabitants of the area a genocide despite pressure and threats from the Armenian Diaspora. [3] Similarly, neither the United States [4] nor Israel [5] will bow the intimidating pressure by the Armenian Diaspora to call the tragedy a genocide.
Dear Mayor,
You hold a law degree and have been a successful trial lawyer in the past. You, above all else, should know the difference between allegations and facts. Armenian charges of genocide are yet-to-be-proven "allegations", not incontrovertible facts. In the absence of a verdict by a competent court, therefore, all the civilized and decent people of the world must use the qualifier "alleged" before the phrase "Armenian Genocide", let alone erecting a monument it on public land.
No one is trying to minimize the suffering of the Armenians; but Armenian suffering must not blind one to the much larger suffering of the Turks and other Muslims of the same era and area, mostly caused by the brutal acts of greedy and vicious Armenian revolutionaries supported by invaders bent on destroying the Ottoman Empire ( Britain, France, and Russia and their Ottoman-Christian proxies.) Calling it genocide would unfairly place all the blame on Turks whereas it was the Ottoman-Armenian revolutionaries that first poisoned the 800 years of mostly harmonious Turkish-Armenian co-habitation in Anatolia with their revolts and treason. [6] We would not oppose Armenians' recognition of Armenian losses if their memorial was named a more realistic "The Armenians' War Memorial."
Dear Mayor, we know that you will do the right thing. Peace in our time,
[1] Revisiting the Armenian Genocide - Middle East Quarterly , Guenter Lewy
[2] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=441&yid=4 , "The Malta Tribunal : Case Closed Due To Lack Of Evidence", Bilal N. Simsir
[3] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=453&yid=4 , British Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[4] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=451&yid=4 , American Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[5] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=462&yid=4 , Israeli and Jewish Sources Refuting The Alleged Armenian Genocide
[6] http://www.ataa.org/ataa/ref/armenian/testimony.html "The Armenian Issue Revisited: Testimony" by Justin McCarthy at the House International Committee also
[7] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=490&yid=4 , Armenian Terrorism: Then And Now
[8] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=509&yid=4 , "Turkish Last Names : Honest Story Tellers", Ergun Kirlikovali
[9] ] Why it was a tragedy of war, Bruce Fein
[10] http://www.turkla.com/yazar.php?mid=525&yid=4 , Connecting The Dots On The "Alleged" Armenian Genocide [11] http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/andonian.htm , The Andonian "Documents" Attributed to Talat Pasha Are Forgeries, By Professor Türkkaya ATAÖV
Lettre Témoin (Française):
Monsieur Le Député,
Depuis longtemps les relations de la République Turque, candidat à l’Union européenne, sont en train de gagner une nouvelle dimension entre les pays Occidentaux. On va justifier que l’Europe, avec le déclenchement de la candidature de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, n’est pas un club chrétien et est une communauté basée sur des valeurs humanitaires et démocratiques. Personne ne doute que la candidature de la Turquie à l’Union européenne donne naissance aux conséquences extrêmement positives à la fois pour la nation turque et européenne. Avec l’admission de la Turquie au membre de l’Union, l’Europe non seulement gagnera un marché de 70 millions, mais aussi obtiendra une porte qui s’ouvre au Moyen Orient, Moyen Asie et aux pays islamiques. Avec le membre de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, ceux qui prévoient le conflit des civilisations se tromperont alors que ceux qui défendent la paix universelle seront renforcés. Terminée son évolution économique, laïque et démocratique la République Turque, sera un modèle à la fois pour les pays du Moyen Orient et à ceux des Caucasiens. Conscient de ce qui passe l’opinion publique turque considère l’Union européenne comme un projet de civilisation le plus grand et approuve la participation à l’Union européenne avec une majorité de 90%. Il faut que vous répondiez franchement et sans préjuger à l’attente du peuple turc défendant la sécurité de l’Europe pendant la guerre froide et que vous encouragiez l’opinion publique turque pour une coopération de plus près avec l’Union européenne.
Malheureusement avec l’influence de certains milieux fanatiques, le Parlement européen a pris certaines décisions injustes, ce qui a déçu l’opinion publique turque. Parmi ces décisions se trouvent celles destinées à la reconnaissance du soi-disant génocide des arméniens. Ces décisions prises sous l’influence des associations arméniennes et des lobbies racistes, sans écouter les points de vue de la Turquie, ne correspondent pas aux valeurs démocratiques et humanitaires que défend le Parlement européen et cela laisse des soupçons profonds dans l’esprit du peuple turc.
Sous des conditions lourdes de la première guerre mondiale en 1915 pour arrêter les massacres que causent les rebelles arméniennes, l’exode que l’Empire ottoman avait fait est présenté comme un massacre par les organisations arméniennes. Nombreux scientifiques occidentaux, non pas les historiens turcs, se sont exprimés que le soi-disant génocide des arméniens n’était qu’un mensonge controuvé et que les réalités historiques étaient détournées. Dans leur recherche Gilles Veinstein, un historien français; Bernard Lewis, un spécialiste en Moyen Orient, Justin McCarthy, Samuel Weems et une centaine de scientifiques ont justifié que ce qui avait vécu en 1915, n’était pas un génocide. Mais malheureusement est survenue la terreur arménienne dans le domaine scientifique et ces scientifiques ont subi des menaces et pressions intenses des arméniens. Les Arméniens ont appliqué des méthodes incroyables pour que ces recherches ne soient pas connues par l’opinion.
En exploitant des valeurs comme les droits de l’homme et la démocratie, les organisations arméniennes racistes, d’une part se sont efforcées d’obtenir des intérêts spirituels et financiers, d’autre part n’ont pas hésité à avoir recours à la terreur. Vous ne pouvez pas avoir oublié que l’organisation terroriste arménienne dite ”ASALA” avait assassiné les diplomates turcs et même les civils innocents jusqu’à 1984. En plus je voudrais vous rappeler que ces crimes ont été vécus en Europe. Ces réseaux sanglants, sous le masque des organisations de communautés civiles et d’associations, tentent de faire des actes pour saboter les relations turco-européennes. Le seul but des ces milieux fascistes qui n’ont pas tiré de leçons de l’histoire est d’établir la grande Arménie avec les territoires arrachés de la Turquie, Azerbaïdjan et Géorgie. Les occupations que l’on vit à Karabakh en ce moment, les massacres appliqués aux azéris et l’épuration ethnique en est la preuve la plus concrète du plan sinistre. Depuis 10 années les territoires d’Azerbaïdjan sont occupés par les Arméniens et à cause de l’épuration ethnique, des centaines de milles azéris sont en train de vivre loin de leur territoire. Je vous conseille de ne pas oublier que ceux qui défendent les victimes du génocide de 1915 ont massacré des milliers de civils à Karabakh à la fin du 20’ème siècle.
Monsieur le député, sous la lumière de ce que je viens de citer en haut je vous appèle à vous opposer à la propagande injuste des organisations arméniennes pro-terroristes. Rendre la paix durable en Europe, mettre fin aux conflits en Caucase, sauver les territoires d’Azerbaïdjan de l’occupation arménienne et renvoyer chez eux les azéris soumis à une épuration ethnique est votre devoir de l’humanité. Vos décisions pour le soi-disant génocide encourageraient l’impérialisme et la terreur arménienne. De plus ces décisions blessent profondément le peuple turc qui a perdu 3 millions et demi de gens pendant la première guerre mondiale. C’est le drame que la plupart des gens qui ont perdu leur vie subissent des attaques des bandes arméniennes. Vos décisions récompensent les agresseurs et attristent les innocents. C’est pourquoi je vous demande de prendre des mesures pour compenser l’atmosphère négative de la décision du 18 juillet 1987.
Je vous prie d’agréer, Monsieur le député, l’assurance de ma considération.
http://www.armenianreality.com
Lettre Témoin (Anglaise):
Dear Parliamentarian,
The relations of Turkish Republic to Western world, which has been a candidate for EU membership for a long time, are about to gain a new dimension. With the start of the membership negotiations with Turkey in 2004 by EU, it would be proven that the European Union is a union based on democratic and human values rather than being only a Christian club. Nobody calls it into question that Turkey’s EU membership will bring very positive results for both Europe and Turkish people. By accepting Turkey to the membership, EU will not only acquire a seventy million market but also it will have a robust door opening to the Middle East, Central Asia and Islamic countries. With Turkey’s EU membership the ones who defend universal peace will gain strength while those who provide for the clash of the civilizations lose ground. A democratic and secular Turkey Republic that has completed her economic development will continue to more effectively play her role of being a good sample for regional countries, especially the Middle East and Caucasia. The Turkish public opinion fully aware of these facts accepts the EU as the greatest civilization project and approves Turkey’s EU membership with a majority reaching 90%. You would certainly appreciate the fact that Europe must sincerely respond to this expectation of the Turkish people, having defended the security of Europe during the Cold War era by paying big prices, without prejudice and Turkish public opinion must be encouraged to make closer cooperation with EU.
Influenced by certain fanatic circles, European Parliament has, unfortunately, taken some decisions, which are wrong, even disappointing the Turkish people. Of these decisions the ones regarding recognition of the alleged Armenian genocide draw special attention. The decisions approved in the Parliament, where the Turkish representatives have not existed, without hearing Turkey’s position in this respect which have been taken with influence of extreme-racist Armenian associations and lobbies contradict the human and democratic values the European Parliament defend and cause deep doubts in the minds of Turkish people.
Today, some Armenian organizations try the deportation the Ottoman administration practiced under the severe conditions of the World War I in 1915 in order to prevent the massacres caused by Armenian risings, to present as genocide. Not only Turkish historians but also many Western scientists have clearly stated the fact that the alleged Armenian genocide is fictitious and the historical truths have been deviated. The researches of French Gilles Veinstein, Middle East specialist Bernard Lewis, Justin McCarthy, Samuel Weems and many more scientists have proven that the events occurred in 1915 is not a genocide. The Armenian terror has, unfortunately, displayed itself also in the scientific field, and these researchers have been exposed to massive threats and pressures. Incredible methods have been employed to prevent the public opinion from being informed about the researches of these scientists.
Racist Armenian organizations have exploited such values as democracy and human rights, to which the European public opinion shows a great sensitivity, in an unfair manner and tried to acquire physical and moral advantage while they have not hesitated from employing terror. I am sure you remember that the Armenian terror organization called ASALA has massacred tens of Turkish diplomats in particular and many innocent civilians until 1984. Moreover, I would like to remind you that a big part of these murders have been experienced in Europe. These bloody murder networks have made great efforts to sabotage the increasingly good relations between the EU and Turkey under the cover of democratic civil society organizations or associations for a long time. The real intention of these fanatic Armenian organizations drawing hatred and enmity from the history instead of learning a lesson is not defending a humanitarian matter. The purpose of these fascist groups is to establish Great Armenia by obtaining some territories from Turkey in particular, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The occupation of Karabagh, massacres on Azerbaijani people and ethnical cleansing are the most concrete evidence for this insidious plan. The Armenian rebels have occupied 20% of Azerbaijani territory for ten years and one million two hundred thousand Azerbaijani people have been displaced and are currently living far from their homeland due to the ethnical cleansing. I propose you to keep in mind that those who introduce themselves to you as the victims of an alleged 1915 genocide have brutally massacred thousands of Azerbaijani civilians in the city Khodjali in Karabagh at the end of 20th Century.
Dear Parliamentarian, I would like to invite you to oppose the untruthful propaganda of the Armenian organizations not hesitating to employ violence under the light of the facts I have tried to explain you. It is a obligation of humanity for you to stand against the Armenian expansionism in order to ensure a permanent peace in our Europe, make an end to the conflicts in Caucasus, save the Azerbaijani territory from the occupation and ensure the one million two hundred thousand Azerbaijani people, who have been exposed to ethnical cleansing, returning to their homes. Your decisions taken 18.07.1987, which were in favor of the alleged genocide, encourage Armenian terror and expansionism. Moreover, these decisions deeply hurt the Turkish people having suffered a three and a half million loss during the World War I. And it is a big tragedy that most of the Turkish victims who have lost their lives have been exposed to attacks of Armenian rebels who have seen war as a great opportunity. Your decisions reward the aggressors while they lead the innocent people to great sorrow. I hope, therefore, you will take decisions that will eliminate the adverse effects of your decision taken 18.07.1987.
Yours faithfully.
CAMPAIGNE TO PROTEST SYLVESTORE STALLONE
CAMPAIGNE TO PROTEST SYLVESTORE STALLONE
Dear Readers,
Please send the following mail to the following addresses to protest Sylvestore Stallone for his role in anti-Turkish film Musa Dagh-40 Days.
The addresses belong to;
1) Sylvester Stallone,
2) His publicist Michelle Bega-Rogers and Cowan Company, and
3) International Creative Management-Talent Agency
Please inform your friends about the protest campaign.
Best Regards,
Armenian Reality
webmaster@sylvesterstallone.com
mbega@rogersandcowan.com
contemporary@icmtalent.com
The Protest Letter:
SUBJECT: Protesting Racsim in 40 Days of MUSA DAGH
Dear Sylvestore Stallone,
The Turkish communities worldwide in the USA, Europe, Australia would like to communicate to you that acting in a false storyline that defames and insults Turks
will cause a major incident not only in inciting further racism by Armenians which already unfairly target innocent Turks worldwide, but will also create a major backlash against Sylvestore Stallone products in the Turkish world that numbers 250 million people. Militant Armenians have spent millions on their hate campaign to defame Turks and have suffered defeats and have been branded hatemongers in each incident.
Sylvestore Stallone is very popular in Turkiye and holds a good stature amongst most Turks. His role in a highly controversial depiction of a Civil War as instigated by Armenian revolutionary militias that killed innocent Ottoman Turks in the period before the end of WW1 will cause a major uproar. His new and old titles maybe boycotted if you proceed with this insulting topic.
We, as fans of Mr. Stallone, plead that he does not accept this role.
You will find a link below that categorizes the fallacies in the storyline of “Musa Dagh - 40 days”.
Sincerely,
Name
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/musa-dagh.htm
QUOTE IN TALL ARMENIANTALE
“Moussa Dagh (Mount Moussa), if the truth be known, is the best evidence of the
Armenian duplicity and rebellion. Fifty thousand Armenians, all armed, ascended the
summit of that mountain after provisioning it to stand siege. Daily sallies from
that summit of armed bands attacked the rear of the Ottoman armies, and disappeared
into the mountain”
Dear Readers,
Please send the following mail to the following addresses to protest Sylvestore Stallone for his role in anti-Turkish film Musa Dagh-40 Days.
The addresses belong to;
1) Sylvester Stallone,
2) His publicist Michelle Bega-Rogers and Cowan Company, and
3) International Creative Management-Talent Agency
Please inform your friends about the protest campaign.
Best Regards,
Armenian Reality
webmaster@sylvesterstallone.com
mbega@rogersandcowan.com
contemporary@icmtalent.com
The Protest Letter:
SUBJECT: Protesting Racsim in 40 Days of MUSA DAGH
Dear Sylvestore Stallone,
The Turkish communities worldwide in the USA, Europe, Australia would like to communicate to you that acting in a false storyline that defames and insults Turks
will cause a major incident not only in inciting further racism by Armenians which already unfairly target innocent Turks worldwide, but will also create a major backlash against Sylvestore Stallone products in the Turkish world that numbers 250 million people. Militant Armenians have spent millions on their hate campaign to defame Turks and have suffered defeats and have been branded hatemongers in each incident.
Sylvestore Stallone is very popular in Turkiye and holds a good stature amongst most Turks. His role in a highly controversial depiction of a Civil War as instigated by Armenian revolutionary militias that killed innocent Ottoman Turks in the period before the end of WW1 will cause a major uproar. His new and old titles maybe boycotted if you proceed with this insulting topic.
We, as fans of Mr. Stallone, plead that he does not accept this role.
You will find a link below that categorizes the fallacies in the storyline of “Musa Dagh - 40 days”.
Sincerely,
Name
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/musa-dagh.htm
QUOTE IN TALL ARMENIANTALE
“Moussa Dagh (Mount Moussa), if the truth be known, is the best evidence of the
Armenian duplicity and rebellion. Fifty thousand Armenians, all armed, ascended the
summit of that mountain after provisioning it to stand siege. Daily sallies from
that summit of armed bands attacked the rear of the Ottoman armies, and disappeared
into the mountain”
ARMENIAN REALITY
ARMENIA
The Great Deception Secrets of a "Christian"
Terrorist State
By
Samuel A. WEEMS
Introduction
Where did the Armenians come from? One doesn't have to look back very far into history to find the answer.
The beginnings of what can be called modern-day Armenia is filled with blood—Muslim blood. In 1820, czarist Russia began the first of several attempts to expand its empire westward in an attempt to obtain an age-old dream of warm-water ports. The czars began a conquest to obtain Ottoman Empire lands all the way to the Mediterranean and open seas.
Before the Russian armies began their campaigns of conquest, the czar's agents were sent into Ottoman lands to organize Christians in an effort to undermine the Ottoman Muslims from within. The Russians reasoned that because they were Orthodox Christians, they would have much in common with other Orthodox Christians, such as the Greeks, the Slavs in the Balkans, and the Armenians.
The Russians were not able to secure a warm-water port, but they did move their boundaries westward. In the years that followed 1820, the Russians promised the Armenians they would help them establish their own state. At that time, the Ottoman Empire was in a final period of decline and decay. Other foreign powers saw this as an opportunity to establish their presence in this part of the world. Both England and France sponsored missionary activities there. All too frequently throughout history, nations have used Christianity to promote the state's best interest and the religious people sent into different parts of the world worked for both Christ and the state's best interests. This would | be the case within the Ottoman Empire.
Russia, trying not to be outdone by the English and French, j sought to gain Armenian support in destroying the Ottoman government. The Russians promised to create a "Greater Arme- j nia" in eastern Anatolia. The Russian promise was substantially more lands between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean than the Armenian people had ever occupied at anytime in their history. In fact, there had never been a truly independent Armenia. There had never been a true "Greater Armenia." Perhaps three thousand years ago there was a tiny kingdom but it did not last long.
This "dream" of a "Greater Armenia" that the Russians created in the minds of a few Armenians in the mid-1800s continues to this day. The Armenians took this Russian promise (that Russians had no intention of keeping) and expanded upon it. Today, Armenians claim all this land between the Black and Mediterranean seas as their "historic homeland." Nothing could be farther from the truth.
The English fanned the flame by calling the Asia Minor of the Bible Armenia. It was Prime Minister William E. Gladstone, in the early 1880s, who concocted the idea that it was in the British's best interests to break up the Ottoman Empire. He wanted to create a number of small friendly states under England's influence in place of the large Ottoman Empire. One such small state would be called Armenia. Gladstone asked the British press to refer to eastern Anatolia as "Armenia." British consulates were opened throughout the region, and their purpose was to make contact with the local Christian population. An Anglo-Armenian Friendship Committee was organized in London with the express purpose of influencing public opinion. Many more Christian missionaries were sent into what England had started calling "Armenia."
In 1877 and 1878 there was another war between the Ottoman Empire and Russia. As the war neared its end, the Christian Armenian patriarch of Istanbul, Nerses Varjabedyan, asked the ;
Russian czar to retain the lands his troops occupied in east Anatolia. Once the war ended the patriarch asked Grand Duke Nicholas, the Russian military commander, to annex all eastern Anatolia into Russia and to help establish an autonomous Armenian state, much like what was being established for Bulgaria. Of course this didn't happen as it was not in the Russians' best interest. In Bulgaria, there was a majority Christian population. In Ottoman Anatolia, Armenians amounted to less than a quarter of the population.
The British feared such Russian influence with the Armenians. They concluded that Russia would be a greater threat than the Ottomans. They realized a Russian-dominated "Greater Armenia" would open up the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean where the British possessions in India could be threatened.
Greater Armenia did not come into being as the Armenians wanted. However, the Armenian officers in the Russian army continued working to stir discontent among the Ottoman Armenians by suggesting they work by themselves to secure the same sort of independence as that secured by the Christians in the Balkans.
It must be noted that in the 1800s, Armenians were scattered within and beyond a region that today marks Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Iran, and eastern Turkey. Everywhere, except in a few small pockets, Armenians were a small minority population. As the Russians acquired lands south of the Caucasus Mountains, they removed the Muslim populations that came under their control. The Muslims were replaced with Christians whom the Russians thought would be loyal to the Russian Christian government. Christian Armenians were the focal point of this policy and were given lands the Russians obtained without paying any compensation. Armenians were moved in once the Russians had removed the Muslim owners.
A large number of Armenians resented being under Muslim 1'ule and they were drawn to the Russians by the offer of free land and becoming a part of a Christian state.
In the Erivan Province, which is the heart of modern-day Armenia, the majority of the population were Muslim before they were removed. The Russians replaced them with Armenians. This is how Armenia acquired what it today calls its "historic homeland," not as direct descendants from the biblical Noah, as many Armenians claim, but by Russians between the years 1827 and 1878.
In each of these Ottoman wars the Armenians helped the Russians. This was the beginning of the ethnic hatred between Christian Armenians and Muslim Ottomans. This conflict was caused by the Russians and their success in pushing the hot button of human greed by giving Armenians free Muslim lands.
During the Russian-forced Muslim removal, it was not uncommon for up to one-third of the Muslims who were forced off their property to die. Today, the Armenians never admit they obtained their free land on the account of widespread deaths of Muslims.
The Russians forcibly removed some 1.3 million Muslims between 1827 and 1878. Russia started wars with the Ottomans in 1828, 1854, and 1877. Each time the Russians would advance, then be forced to retreat. When the Russians retreated, the Armenians, fearing Muslim retaliation for the violence they had done to the non-Christians, would flee with the Russians. Hatred grew on both sides.
In the 1890s there were Armenian rebellions in eastern Anatolia. The end result was many Muslims and Christians were killed. The same thing happened again during the Russian Revolution in 1905 in Azerbaijan.
A civil war broke out again between Christians and Muslims when World War I began. Armenian revolutionaries, many trained in Russia, attempted to take major Ottoman cities in eastern Anatolia. They did manage to capture the unarmed city of Van and hold it until the Russians arrived. The Armenians killed all but a few Muslim civilians in the city and nearby villages. Such killings by both sides went on until 1920, two years after the war officially ended. Many of the Muslim Ottoman Turks and Armenian Christians died from starvation and disease.
There will be many examples of proof presented by European officials of "official" Armenian terrorism tactics used in eastern Anatolia. There are many western diplomatic and consular representatives [including American) who reported what was actually happening there. They concluded it was the Armenian revolutionary societies doing the revolting, slaughtering, and massacring of Muslims. These officials believed that one reason for all the Armenian massacres was to secure European intervention on their behalf. The Armenians always managed to send reports stating they were being killed when the truth was it was they who were massacring civilians.
For centuries Christians have been told stories about the terrible Turk and the evils of Islam. These tales date back to the Crusades when the "purity" of Christianity opposed the black Muslims. The horrible truth is men, acting in the name of Christ, were more brutal and committed more terrible acts during this time than did the Muslims. The Muslims were simply defending their lands, which were invaded by a horde of profit-seeking men in the name of Jesus.
States in the Balkans and Caucasus regions of the world are made up of fairly homogenous populations as a result of ethnic cleansing. These states were created out of what was once a part of the Ottoman Empire as a result of wars and revolutions. In simple terms, these new states were built on a foundation of Muslim suffering.
There is no historical mention in textbooks of this colossal Muslim loss. These textbooks tell the stories of massacres by Muslims of Christian Armenians, Christian Bulgarians, and Christian Greeks. But there are no written accounts in Western textbooks of Muslim losses and massacres committed by Christian peoples.
In the United States, the Christian Armenian-American people have mounted campaigns in recent years to get cities, states, and the national government to condemn Muslim Turkey for committing what the Armenian claim is a genocide in 1915 of some 1.5 million of Christian Armenians. If such a story is made up by Armenian-American Christians to support Armenian agendas, other Christians must oppose them. Christians must reach out to the Muslim world and stop giving American dollars to Armenia if the war on terrorism is to ever end.
pls visit
http://www.armenianreality.com/books/index.htm
Samul Weems kitabının özeti
Kitapta başlıca yazarın yaptığı tespitler:
Ermenistan'in 1700 yil önce iddia ettigi ilk Hiristiyan ülke oldugu yaklasimi yanlistir.
Ermeniler Osmanli Devletine ihanet etmis; gelecekte ki tehlikeyi gören her devletin yapacagi sey yapilmis ve sürgün meydana gelmistir.
Pek çok Ingiliz ve Amerikali yetkiliye göre Ermeniler, Osmanli topraklarini kendi istekleri ile terk etmislerdir.
1973-2001 yillari arasinda Ermeni Teröristler, 100'den fazla saldiri düzenlemis ve 70'e yakin kisiyi öldürmüslerdir.
Ermenilerin yaptiklari katliamlar, Rus arsivlerinde de bulunmaktadir.
Ermeni Devrimci Federasyonu'nun arsivlerini halka açmamasi, beklide ikinci Dünya Savasinda, Nazi Almanya'sina Ermenilerin verdigi destegin dürüst tarihçiler tarafindan ortaya çikarilmasinin engellenmesidir.
Ermeniler, Yahudilerin Naziler tarafindan katledilmesine yardim etmislerdir.
Ermeniler, 1948 yilina kadar hiçbir sekilde soykirimdan bahsetmemislerdir.
Tüm Osmanli kayitlarina göre Sözde soykirimi konusunda, sadece 4 münferit olay vardir. Ve Planli hiçbir katliam yoktur.
Ilk ve tek resmi Ermeni kilisesi, terörist eylemleri desteklemektedir.
Rus Kizil Ordusu, tek kursun atmadan Ermenistana girmistir.
Osmanlilarin, Ermenileri sürgün etmesi, ABD'nin 1941'de Japon Asilli yaptigi sürgünle ayni anlami tasimaktadir.
Ermeni Lobisi, ABD-Türkiye-Azerbaycan iliskileri konusunda problem çikarmayi bir strateji olarak uygulamaktadir.
Ermenistan, Hiristiyan milletlerden ve kiliselerden Hiristiyanligi kullanarak yardim toplamaktadir.
ABD, Ingiltere, Fransa, Rusya ve Türkiye arsivler arastirmacilara açik olup, Ermenistanda ermeni arsivleri kapalidir.
Parali Ermeni ajanlari, ABD'de kamuoyu olusturuyorlar.
Samuel Weems ve sözde ErmenI soykIrImI
konusunda IfsacIliklarI...Hasan Saferi
Samuel A. Weems, Arcanzas eyaletinde Hazen'de ünlü yargiç ve hukukçuydu. O Arcanzas Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi'nden hukuk doktorasina sahip ve sehir surasinda etkinlik göstermekle birlikte adi geçen eyaletin anayasasinin yeniden düzenlenmesinde ilgili kurula seçilir.
Samuel Weems birçok makalenin yazari olup ayni zamanda çaliskan bir arastirmaci ve gezgin sayilir. O ömrünün sonlarinda Ermenilerin Büyük Kurnazligi Kitaplari dizisindeki ünlü kitabi “Ermenistan, Terörist Hiristiyan Ülkesinin Sirlari”(Secrets of A “Christian” Terrorist State - 2002) eserini kaleme aldi.
Samuel Weems bu kitabi yazabilmek için kendi kenti disinda Washington, Londra, Paris, Roma, Moskova, Istanbul vb. sehirlere yolculuk edip bu ülkelerin kütüphane ve arsivlerinde bu zeminde kapsamli arastirmalara girismis ve adi geçen eseri kaleme almistir. O, kitabinin önsözünde Ermenistan arsivlerinin kendi yüzüne kapatildigini ve Amerika'daki Ermeni lobilerinin kendisine karsi çiktigini ve onlarin tarafindan tehdide ugradigini söylemektedir. Bu kitabin Amerika'da Ingilizce yayimlanmasindan bir süre sonra müellif gizemli bir biçimde vefat ediyor.
“Ermenistan, Terörist Hiristiyan Ülkesinin Sirlari” kitabi 2004'te Bakü'de de Azerbaycan Türkçesi'ne çevrilmis ve yayinlanmistir. Biz bu makalede Samuel Weems'in bu kitaptaki ifsaciliklarinin bir kismina deginecegiz.
Samuel Weems 13. sayfada Ermenilerin sözde Ermeni soykirimina yönelik öykülemelerine isaret edip onlarin bu konudaki iddialarinin yalan oldugunu, Ermenileri rezil duruma düsürecek muteber tarihi delillerin varligini vurgulamaktadir. O, ardindan Ermenilerin bu öykülemeden amaçlarinin Amerika ve Türkiye'den bollu dolarlar koparmak ve onu 150 yillik eskilige sahip olan ülkelerinin refahina harcamak oldugunu yaziyor.
Samuel Weems kitabinin 28. sayfasinda Ermeniler ve Türkler arasinda ihtilaf ve düsmanligin nasil olustuguna ve bu arada ihtilaf düsüren etkene yani Ruslara deginerek, “Rusya ordusu Osmanli Imparatorlugu'na saldirmadan önce Müslümanlarin güvenini sarsmak ve Hiristiyanlari seferber etmek maksadiyla kendi casuslarini bölgeye gönderdi. 1820 yilindan sonra Ruslar Ermenilere kendilerine devlet kurmakta yardim edecekleri sözünü verdiler.” diye yaziyor.
“Ruslar Osmanli ile savasta Ingilizler ve Fransizlardan geride kalmasinlar diye Osmanli Devleti'nin yikilma ve isgalinde Ermeni etkenini kullanma karari aldilar. Onlar “Büyük Ermenistan” rüyasini Ermenilerin beyninde pisirip onlara Karadeniz'den Akdeniz'e dek Dogu Anadolu'da –yani Ermenilerin hiçbir zaman tarih boyu bir kez olsun bile isgal edemedikleri büyük bir yurtta– Ermeni ülkesi yaratacaklarina dair vaatler verdiler.Aslinda tarihte hiçbir zaman Büyük Ermenistan varolmamis ve bu mesele Ruslar tarafindan tasarlanmis bir düsten baska bir sey degildir.”
Oysa Ruslarin bölgeye sizmasindan önce Türklerin ve Ermenilerin iliskileri dostaneydi. Samuel Weems bu meseleye deginerek kitabinin 33. sayfasinda söyle yazar: “Sene 1453'te Türkler simdiki Istanbul'u fethettikten sonra, Osmanli Sultani Hiristiyanligi ülkede resmiyete tanidi ve Bursa'nin Ermeni papazi Huakim Oakim'i Osmanli'nin Ermeni Hiristiyanlarinin dini lideri olarak seçti. Ermeniler ve Türkler arasinda gelisen bu dostluk, sonraki 3 yüzyil boyunca da devam etti ve bu Avrupa'nin hâlâ propagandaya baslamis olmadigi dönemdeydi.
Osmanli sultani Ermeni kilisesine yardim ettikten sonra, Bizans hükümeti tarafindan Kirim'a sürülmekte olan 70 binden fazla Ermeni'yi oradan kurtarip Ege Denizi kiyilarinda Istanbul'un güneyine yerlestirdi.
Bu Ermeniler Sultan'in muteber arkadaslari olarak bilinirlerdi ve Sultan onlara birçok haklar ve özgürlükler vermisti. Bu meselelere bakmayarak bu imparatorlugun inis ve düsüs döneminde Ermenilerin bazilari Osmanli hükümdarlarinin kendilerine yapmis oldugu iyilikleri unutup hatta inkar ettiler. Sonuçta, türedi hain Ermeni liderleri Avrupa devletlerinin himayesi altinda o devletlere yandaslik ederek Osmanli topraklarinin kayitsiz sartsiz isgali için müzakerelere girdiler. Bu azinlik Ermeni takimiyla müzakerelere girisen ilk devlet Rusya'ydi.
Samuel Weems Ermenilerin Rus casuslari araciligiyla kiskirtilmasina deginerek Osmanli Imparatorlugu topraklarinda Ermenilerin terörist eylemlerinin biçimlenmesi konusunda söyle yaziyor: “1890 yilinda Osmanli Imparatorlugu ülkeleri içerisinde küçük bir Ermeni terörist grubu Müslümanlarin yurdunu, malini sahiplenmek için devrimci eyleme basladi. Onlar, son 500 yilda Türklerle karsilikli dostane ve uzlasmaci iliskiler içindelerken Osmanli Müslümanlarina karsi terörist eylemelere giristiler.
1914-1915 yillarina dek Osmanli Imparatorlugu'ndaki bu terörist çete o kadar küçüktü ki, Türkler onu önemsemiyorlardi. Rusya'nin Osmanli'ya karsi isgalci savasinin baslamasindan sonra, Ermeniler hasretinde bulunduklari yurtlari sahiplenmek için Ruslarla birlestiler.
Türkiye Ermenileri gündüzün kendilerini Osmanli ordusunun dostu gibi gösteriyor, geceleyin terörist eylemlerle Osmanli ordusuna öldürücü darbeler indiriyorlardi. Ermenilerin bu terörist eylemleri sonucunda, Osmanli hükümeti savas bölgesinde bulunan Ermenileri bu bölgelerden göç ettirmek zorunda kaldi. Çünkü Ermenilerin riyakarligi sonucunda Türkler terörist Ermenileri terörist olmayandan ayirt edemiyorlardi. Nihayetinde bu durumda kendisini saldirgan düsmanin hücumundan ve de Ermenilerin terörist hamlelerinden korumak isteyen bir milletin hain ve terörist Ermenileri savas bölgesinden göç ettirmekten baska çaresi yoktu.”
Samuel Weems bu olayla ve Türklerin bu yerinde girisimi ile ilgili ABD'nin bu ülkenin bati kiyilarinda yasayan ve Japonlara yardim etmeleri ihtimali sezilen Japonlari göç ettirmekteki benzer girisimini örnek vererek söyle yazmakta: “Japonya'nin Amerika'ya 7 Aralik 1941'deki saldirisindan sonra, ABD'nin bati eyaletlerinde yasayan Japonlar, bu türlü eylemlerin son örnegi olarak geçici transferle karsi karsiya kaldilar. 19 Subat 1942'de Franklin Rouswelt özel 9006 fermanini imzalayarak Japonlarin göç ettirilmesine emir verdi.
Samuel Weems, Ermenilerin Ruslar araciligiyla oyuncaga çevrilmesine iliskin söyle yaziyor: “Sene 1808'de Rus çari I. Aleksandr, Ermeni kilisesi papazi Daniel'e Rusya'ya yardim için Osmanli'ya karsi casusluklari dolayisiyla 1. dereceli Kutsal Anna Madalyasi'ni sundu. Ruslar batiya dogru saldirip Osmanli topraklarinda ilerlediklerinde Ermeni kilisesi hep Ruslara yardim ediyordu.”
Samuel Weems muteber tarihi delillerle ve Anadolu bölgesinde ve çevresinde bulunan Batili temsilcilerin yazi ve notlarina istinat ederek Ermenilerin iddialarinin esassiz oldugunu kanitliyor. O kitabinin 41. sayfasinda söyle yazar:
“Agustos 1889'da Britanya'nin Erzurum'daki Baskonsolosu Albay Chermsaide, Britanya'nin Istanbul Büyükelçisi'ne rapor verirken “Ermenilerin soykirimi ve Müslümanlarin haremlerinin çalinmis Ermeni kizlari ile dolmasi konusunda çabalamak ve konusmak gülünç bir abartmacadir.” diye yaziyor.
Ayni zamanda, Thomas Botadgiyan (Boyaciyan) diye bir Ermeni olan Britanya Baskonsolosu Yardimcisi Britanya Büyükelçisi'nin kendisine Osmanli padisahinin Ermenilerin soykirimi konusundaki fermanina göre sorusunu yanitlarken böyle bir fermanin hiçbir zaman çikarilmis olmadigi yanitini verir. Boyaciyan ayrica ardindan, kendisinin Ermenilerin kisisel çikarlar ugruna birbirlerini katledip suçunu Müslümanlarin üzerine attiklarini kanitlayan bir sürü delilleri bulundugunu yazar.”
Samuel Weems Britanya Baskonsolosu Yardimcisi'nin güz 1889'daki raporuna dayanarak “Ermeniler azinlik odlulari bölgelerde Müslümanlar ve Hiristiyanlar arasinda düsmanlik yaratiyorlardi. Ermeni teröristler birkaç Müslüman'i öldürüp ötekiler arsina ihtilaf düsürüyorlardi. Bu davranislarin asil nedeni Müslümanlari Hiristiyanlarla çatismaya zorlamak ve daha sonra güya Hiristiyanlar Türkler tarafindan soykirima ugradilar diye kampanya baslatmakti.
Bu terörist örgüt (Tasnaksiyon) kendi üye ve yandaslarina her bir yerde ve her bir sartta Türkleri kursuna dizmelerini emretmisti. Bu emirden imtina eden her bir Ermeni eylemci ve casus ise onlarin eliyle öldürülüyordu.”
Samuel Weems ayni zamanda kitabin 46. sayfasinda, Ser Ellis Bartlet Subat 1895'te Ermenilerin soykirimi konusunda tanikliklar ve görüslerini yayinlamis ve orada söyle yazar der: “Türk-Ermeni olaylari konusunda bu genislikte yayinlanan öykülemeler genelde yalandan ve hayalden baska bir sey degildir ve bu söylentiler garaz ve öfke yüzünden uydurulmus, yönlendirilmektedir. Bu propagandacilarin asil amaci Ermeni azaplari karsisinda Ingiltere'nin Türkiye aleyhine duygularini dalgalandirmaktir.”. Bartlet ardindan, “Bu esassiz efsaneler Ermenilerin Devrimci Komitesi'nin uydurmalari olup bu propagandacilarin ve sermayeleri ile bu çirkin amelin arkasinda durmus olan Panislavistlerin çikarlarini temin etmek için genis bir biçimde Avrupa'da yayinlanmaktaydi.” diye yaziyordu.
Bartlet ayni zamanda, kendisi sahsen Ermenilerin isyanlarinin birirnin tanigi olan Ispanyol cografyaci M. Kosimos'un gözlemlerini göre de bu olaylarin Ermenilerin soykirim iddialariyla çeliskide oldugunu yaziyor. Kosimos sahsen Ermenilerin soykirimin gerçeklestirildigini iddia ettikleri bölgelere ugramis ve açikça, “Bu olaylar yayildigi bu genislikle tamamiyla tahriflerden baska bir sey degil. Binlerce Ermeni'nin katliami, onlarin namuslarina tecavüz, halkin iskence edilmesi ve musibetler, sadece tahriflerin vahsicesine icadidir.” diyor.
Samuel Weems kitabinin 35. sayfasinda, Britanya'nin askeri taniklarina, 1895 yilinda Osmanli Imparatorlugu'na gönderilmis olan Charles Norman'in tanikligina isaret eder: “Bes yil süresince Anadolu'da dökülen kanlarin sorumlulugu dogrudan dogruya Hinçak Komitesi (terörist Ermeni örgütü) boynunadir.” O, daha sonra Ermenilerin Müslümanlar tarafindan soykirima ugradiklarina dair bu yaygaralarinin esassiz oldugunu yazar.
S. Weems, kitabin 35. sayfasinda söyle devam eder: Osmanli-Rus Savasi'nda, Müslüman Türk ahalinin birçogu öldürülüp veya yurtlarini terk etmek zorunda kaliyorlardi. Iste o zaman Ermeniler adi geçen bölgelere yerlesiyorlardi. Simdiki Ermenistan Cumhuriyeti de aynen bu sekilde Ermenilerin iskani ve Azerbaycanli Müslüman'in evinden barkindan kaçmak zorunda birakilmasi ve sonuçta bu bölgelerde Ermeni çogunlugunun saglanmasiyla yaratilmistir.
Ermenilerin terörist eylemleri ve Rusya ile savasta Türklere ihanet etmesi sonucu Türkler Ermenileri savas bölgelerinden diger bölgelere göçürme karari aldilar. Weems s. 54'te bu meseleyi konusunda söyle yaziyor: “Su tarihi delil ve belgeye dikkat edin: Osmanli hükümeti 24 Nisan 1915'te Istanbul'da Ermenilerin yerini degistirme karari alir. 3 gün sonra, henüz hiçbir Ermeni Dogu Anadolu'dan göç ettirilmemisken Ermenilerin Açmiyadzin Kilisesi'nin dini lideri Rusya'ya, Osmanli devletinin Ermenileri katletmeye tesebbüs ettigini bildirir! Soykirim nasil yapilmis olabilirdi, oysa yer degistirme operasyonu bile baslamis degildi ve bir tek Ermeni dahi yer degistirmek için yükünü çatmis degildi!?
Roma ve Washington'da Rusya Büyükelçiligi'ne Ermenilerin protestolarini destekleme emri verilmisti. Çünkü Rusya genis tedbirlerle Amerika devleti ve toplumunu kamuoyunu Osmanli ve Alman ülkelerine karsi tahrik etmeye çalisiyordu. Bu büyük yalanciliklar sonucunda Italya bir ay sonra savasa katildi ve ABD sadece iki yil sonra Almanya ile savasa basladi.
Iste bu 27 Nisan günü Rusya'nin Londra'daki büyükelçisi Rusya, Britanya ve Fransa hükümetlerinin Osmanli devletine itiraz notasi vermelerini ve Türklerin soykirimda sorumlu oldugunu beyan etmelerini önerdi.
Britanya Disisleri Bakanligi'ndan George T. Clarck Rusya'nin bu önerisinden rahatsiz oldugunu açiklar, “Kendimizin iddia edilen bu soykirimi incelememiz daha iyi olurdu. Her halde biz ülkemizin Roma ve Washington'daki büyükelçilerine, Ermenilerin dini liderinin adi geçen önerisinin kabul edilebilirligi konusunda o ülkelerin görüslerini ögrenmelerini ve Rusya'nin önerisini desteklemelerini teblig ederiz.” diye cevaplar.
15 Mayis 1915'te Britanya'nin Rusya'daki büyükelçisi, ülkesinin Disisleri Bakani Garry'ye, Rusya'nin Disisleri Bakanligi'nin Ittifak Devletleri tarafindan Osmanli devletine bu ülkelerin liderlerinin savasin sonunda her türlü Ermeni soykirimindan sorumlu tutulacagina dair uyari verecegini bildirdi. Rusya'nin bu bakani ayrica, üç müttefik ülkenin bu meseleyi desteklemek için ayni günde birlikte bir bildiri yayinlamalarini önerdi.
23 Mayis 1915'te Osmanli hükümeti ilk olarak Ermenilerin transferi ve baska bir bölgeye yerlestirilmesi konusunda 4. Ordu Komutanligi'na emir verdi. Fakat tabii ki Ermenileri transferi zaman alici bir isti. Ancak 30 Mayis'ta Osmanli devleti Bakanlar Kurulu Ermenilerin savasin ön cephelerinden cephe arkasindaki diger bölgelere tasinmasi meselesini onayladi. Yer degistirme operasyonu henüz baslamamisken, Ittifak Devletleri, Rusya, Ingiltere ve Fransa, bu meselenin onaylanmasindan 6 ay önce Osmanlilarin Ermeni soykiriminda sorumlu bulunduklarina dair bildiri çikarmis, skandal baslatmislardi!”
S. Weems, ardindan muteber tarihi belgelere dayanarak, “Aslinda Ermenilerin dini lideri Türkiye'nin Ermeni tehciri konusunda karar almasindan birkaç hafta önce yabanci devletlerin bu hususta faaliyete baslamasina zemin olusturmustu. Soykirim iddiasi hiçbir gerçeklik payi tasimaz ve tamamiyla Ermeni papazinin uydurdugu efsanedir.” diye yazar.
Kilisenin bu yalanci ve güdümlü efsaneleriyle birlikte bu merkezin dini liderleri Ermenilerin azinligi bulunduklari Osmanli topraklarindaki terörist ve ayrilikçi eylemlerini körüklemekteydi. “15 Temmuz 1915'te Ermenilerin dini lideri V. Govrek, Yüksek Dini Lider Pogus Nobar'a mektup yazmis, o da Britanya Disisleri Bakani Ser Arthur Nickolson ile temas kurmustu. Bu yüksek dini lider Ittifak Devletleri'nden Türkiye'nin alti ilinde bagimsiz ve tarafsiz Ermenistan yaratmalarini istedi. Bu dini lider, hatta ticari iliskiler kurulmasi amaciyla Mersin araciligiyla serbest denize bir çikis koridoru yaratilmasi talebindeydi.” (S. Weems, s. 57).
Weems, kitabin 59. sayfasinda 1917 Rusya Bolsevik Ihtilali'ne isaret ederek saldirgan Rus kuvvetlerinin Rusya'ya dönmek zorunda kaldigini ve Türklerin ülkesinden geri döndüklerinde onlarla birlikte Türk topraklarini isgal etmekte istira etmis olan Ermenileri de o ülkeden tasinmak mecburiyetinde biraktilar. “Ermenilerin bu topraklardan gitmesinden birkaç ay sonra Britanya ordusu binbasisi E. O. Noel bölgeyi teftis etmis ve gözlemleri konusunda Britanya hükümetine söyle rapor verir: “Gezimin sonucu konusunda diyebilirim ki, bu aylar boyunca Rusya ordusu onlara refakat eden Ermenilerle bahar ve yaz 1916'da isgal ettikleri topraklari viraneye çevirmislerdi. Hiç kusku duymadan söyleyebilirim ki, Türkler düsmanlari için böyle davranamazlardi.” Onun görgü taniklari ve yerli ahalinin söyledikleri ile asagi yukari ayni olan görüslerine esasen Ruslar Ermenilerin tahrik ve yardimiyla bölgedeki Müslümanlarin katliamina girismislerdi.”
Weems s. 88'de söyle yaziyor: “Ermeniler geri çekilirken artik oklarinin tasa isabet ettigini, ne kendilerinin ne de Ruslarin Dogu Anadolu'yu isgal edemeyeceklerini kavramislardi. Dolayisiyla Ermeniler Dogu Anadolu'yu terk ederken her yeri ve her seyi yikip yaktilar, ahaliyi katliam edip yagmaladilar. Ermenilerin bu terörist eylemlerinin tanigi olan bölgelerden biri Erzincan'dir. Kuyular Müslümanlarin cesediyle doluydu. Müslümanlarin bedenlerinin dogranmis azasi ve gövdesiz baslari evlerin bahçeleri çevresine dagilmisti. 606 kisinin cesedini kuyulara, hendeklere atmislardi. Elbette öldürülen sivil ahalinin sayisi bunun birkaç katiydi. Ayrica, galiba yol çekmek için sehrin disina götürülmüs olan 650 Müslüman'in da kaderi belirsiz.”
“Ermeniler bu araziyi isgal etmek ve sahiplenmek için çogunlukta olan Müslümanlari katliam etmek karari aldilar. Onlar Müslümanlari katliam edip bu topraklarda birer Müslüman birakmadiklari takdirde Müslüman ülkesinde kendilerine bagimsiz Ermeni devleti kurabileceklerine inaniyorlardi. Bu terörcü siyasetin amaci buydu ve bugün Azerbaycan ülkesinde de ayni siyaset devam ediyor.” (Weems, s. 60).
Ermenistan, Terörist Hiristiyan Ülkesinin Sirlari kitabinin 42. sayfasinda, Ermenilerin yasadiklari iddia edilen 6 ildeki Ermenilerin ve Müslümanlarin sayisi üzerinde durulur: “1892 yilinda Britanya Disisleri Bakanligi Cografya Merkezi Ermenilerin iddia ettikleri bölgelerin ahalisi konusunda su bilgileri yayinladi:
Il
Müslüman
Rum
Ermeni
Saire
Toplam
Erzurum
500.782
3.725
135.087
22
636.616
Sivas
839.514
76.433
170.433
1.086.015
Diyarbakir
377.644
9.440
79.189
45.233
471.506
Harput
504.946
650
69.718
575.314
Van
247.000
79.998
103.002
430.000
Bitlis
257.862
210
131.390
9.162
398.624
G. Toplam:
2.687.748
90.093
665.815
157.419
3.601.075
Yukaridaki tabloda görüldügü gibi Ermeniler iddiacisi olduklari 6 ilin tümünde azinliktaydilar. Nitekim adi geçen illerde 3.601.075 kisilik ahalinin sadece 665.815 kisisi (% 18.49) Ermeni idi. Yani aslinda Ermeniler 2.935.260 gayri Ermeni'yi yok edip de onlarin topraklarinda Ermenistan devleti kurmak istiyorlardi. Ayni zamanda Britanya Disisleri Bakanligi Cografya Merkezi'nin bu istatistiginden, Ermenilerin etnik temizlemeye tabi tutuldugunu ve 1.5 milyon Ermeni'nin öldürüldügünü iddia ettikleri Anadolu'da sayilarinin toplam bir milyonun az üstünde iken tehcir olayinda 1.5 milyonu nasil öldürülmüs olabilir sorusu akla gelir. Oysa Ermenilerin çogu Kafkaslara göçüp Ruslarin himayesi ile Irevan (Erivan) Hanligi'nda iskan ettirildiler ve daha sonra Azerbaycan'in bu eski kösesinde Ermenistan Cumhuriyeti'ni kurdular.
Weems'in sayfa 143'te, Ermeni tarihçilerinin yazilarina ve varolan çeliski ve tahriflere deginmesi de dikkate deger: “Hevanesiyan Kafkaslara yarim milyon avare Ermeni'nin intikal edildigini yazar. Hevanesiyan kitabinin baska bölümlerinde, Arap ülkelerinde binlerce savas çarpmis Ermeni'nin varligina isaret eder. O kitabinin basinda, Türkiye savas bölgesinde yaklasik bir milyon Ermeni'nin yasadigini ve intikale tabi tutuldugunu yaziyor. Basit bir matematik islemle Ermenilerin iddiasinin yalanligini ve sahteligini anlamak mümkün.”. Ayrica, ABD'nin bölge raporuna göre, 1916 yilinda Osmanli Imparatorlugu'nda yarim milyondan daha fazla Ermeni yasamaktaydi. Bunun disinda, Suriye, Irak, Iran vb ülkelerde yüz binlerce Ermeni yasiyordu. 1915'te 1.5 Ermeni katledilmis olsaydi, durum böyle olamazdi.
Üstelik S. Weems Osmanli Içisleri Bakanligi'na ait 7 Aralik 1916 tarihli bir belgeye dikkat çekiyor. Bu belgede, “702.900 Ermeni tebdil-i
mekan ettirilmis, bu amaçla 1915'te 25 milyon kurus para harcanmistir. Ekim 1916'nin sonuna dek, 86 milyon kurus harcanmis ve bu yilin sonuna dek 150 milyon kurus harcanacaktir.” diye yaziyor. Türkler Ermenileri etnik temizlemeye tabi tutmak isteselerdi o zaman neden bu isi yapmayip da devletin mali krizde bulundugu bir dönemde Ermenilerin savas bölgesinden yerin degistirmek için 261 milyon kurus para sarf etmistir?!
S. Weems, kitabin 98. sayfasinda, Ermenilerin sayisi hususunda, Hevanesiyan'in Türkiye'ye yerlesmis Ermenilerin sayisini hiçbir belgeye dayanmadan yaklasik 2 milyon olarak göstermesine deginir ve muteber tarihi delillerle bu yalanci iddiayi çürütüp “Aslinda 1915'te tüm dünyada dahi bu sayida Ermeni yoktu!” diye yazar. O, s. 62'de bölgenin tamamindaki Ermenilerin sayisi konusunda çesitli kaynaklar tarafindan sunulan istatistiklere de yer verir:
Fransa'ni Van'daki Baskonsolosu M. Zarcheshy : 1.300.000
Fransis de Persens (1895): 1.200.000
Turo Menkis : 1.300.000
Linch (1901): 1.158.000
Osmanli Istatistikleri (1905): 1.294.851
Britanya Mavi Kitabi (1912): 1.056.000
L.D. Counterson (1913): 1.400.000
Fransa Sari Kitabi: 1.475.000
Ermeni dini lideri Ormaniyan: 1.600.000
Lepsios : 1.600.000
S. Weems ayni yerde, “Günümüzde Ermeniler 1.5 milyon Ermeni'nin Osmanli Türkleri tarafindan katledilmesi konulu “büyük efsane”den aslinda XX. yüzyildaki ilk etnik temizleme hikayesini yaratmislardir. Onlarin iddiasi, yani katledilmis 1.5 milyon Ermeni Anadolu Ermenilerinin toplam sayisinin bile birkaç katiydi.” diye yaziyor.
Samuel Weems, “ Ermenistan, Terörist Hiristiyan Ülkesinin Sirlari ” kitabindaki kapsamli arastirmalariyla, Ermenilerin bu makalenin sinirlarini asan sayisiz cinayet ve hilelerini ifsa etmistir. O bu ifsaciliklardan sonra, “Ermeniler kendilerini magdur göstermek ve 1915 sözde soykirim konusunda dedikodular yaymakla hâlâ kendi cinayetkâr siyasetlerinin pesini birakmamakta, XX. yüzyilin sonlarinda komsulari Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti'ne saldirarak bu ülkenin topraklarinin %20'den fazlasini isgal etmis ve Karabag ile çevresindeki bölgelerde vahsi ve korkunç katliamlarla bir milyon Azerbaycanli Müslüman'in yurdundan olmasina neden olmuslardir.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)